Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBenke, J.
*249Plaintiff Harley Davidson and its subsidiaries (Harley-Davidson) form a multistate enterprise with numerous functionally integrated subsidiary corporations. It contends that defendant California Franchise Tax Board's (Board) tax scheme violates the commerce clause of the federal Constitution ( U.S. Const., art. I, § 8, cl. 3 ), claiming that it burdens interstate enterprises by providing a benefit to intrastate enterprises not available to interstate enterprises. An intrastate unitary business may use either combined or separate accounting to report its income to the Board, whereas…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Butler Bros. v. McColgan, Franchise Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 2009 Metropoulos Family Trust v. California Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Garcia-Rojas v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026