Legal Opinion

Garcia-Rojas v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 2026No. A172054Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/1/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE XAVIER GARCIA-ROJAS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A172054 v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, (City & County of San Francisco Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. CGC23606654) In May 2023, Xavier and Sana Garcia-Rojas1 sued the Franchise Tax Board (Board) seeking a tax refund for 2018 to 2020. The trial court granted the Board’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that Garcia-Rojas operated a unitary business and he was properly taxed under California Code of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Edison California Stores, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API