Legal Opinion

Merrick v. Appenzeller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1921No. 16291PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered August 10,1920, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to subject property to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court for the benefit of creditors, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action to subject two certain lots in the city of Everett to the jurisdiction of the bankrupt court for the benefit of creditors of the *182respondents, who have been adjudged bankrupts, as being their community property.

Respondents alleged that the property sought to be seized was the separate property of Harriet H. Appenzeller, the wife of William H. Appenzeller, the other respondent, and not community property. Appellant excepted to the finding by the court that the real estate in controversy is the separate property of the wife member of the community, having been purchased with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yesler v. HochstettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Meyers v. AlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hester v. StineWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Boyd v. BondyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Carlson v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brown v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Northwest Lumber Co. v. Scandinavian American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API