Legal Opinion

Hester v. Stine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1907No. 6369PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Columbia county, Miller, J., entered March 29, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of replevin.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

Action in replevin for the recovery of personal property. The suit was brought by respondent, Mary Hester, for the recovery of the possession of several hundred sacks of barley, or for the value thereof in case recovery could not be had. The respondent was a married woman, but the complaint was in the ordinary form, not disclosing the fact that she was a married woman, but alleging ownership and right of possession, demand, and refusal. The answer of the sheriff, appellant here, set up the fact that the property was taken under execution; also alleging that the plaintiff was the wife of one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yesler v. HochstettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Freeburger v. CaldwellWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. HoittWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In re the Estate of BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Merrick v. AppenzellerWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Peterson v. BarryWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hammond v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API