Legal Opinion
State v. Romel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 12, 1982No. 80-10-194, 80-10-196, CA A20152PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his jury convictions of attempted rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375 and ORS 161.405, and sodomy in the first degree. ORS 163.405. He contends that the trial court erred (1) in holding a closed competency hearing over his objection, (2) in denying his motion for a mistrial, (3) in finding that the complaining witness was competent to testify, (4) in refusing his proffered instruction on the testimony of children and (5) in committing such an accumulation of errors as to require reversal.
Defendant first complains that his right to a public trial and due process were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. DeizOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Kashmir Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. BashawOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BozgozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.