Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court
Decided May 8, 1986No. TC 2039 and 2196 TC 2042 and 2191PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL N. BYERS, Judge.
These matters are before the court on defendant’s motion to close a discovery hearing. The cases have been consolidated for purposes of discovery because both plaintiffs are represented by the same counsel.
During the course of a hearing on plaintiffs’ motions for protective orders in discovery, defendant proferred information concerning Union Pacific. Defendant explained that it had obtained the information on the condition that it be kept confidential and was to be used in assessing Union Pacific’s property only. Accordingly, defendant requested the court to exclude all…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington Co. Assr. v. Jehovah's Witnesses, Tc 4708 (or.tax 3-22-2005)Oregon Tax Court · 2005
- Washington County Assessor v. West Beaverton Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc.Oregon Tax Court · 2005