Samet v. Binson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover money owed, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bunyan, J.), dated September 10, 2007, as granted the plaintiff leave to re-serve the summons and complaint, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the same order as, after a hearing, denied his motion to reject a referee’s report of the same court (Archer, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated March 27, 2007, determining that service of process was not properly effected upon the defendant, and granted the defendant’s cross motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McMullen v. ArnoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rosenzweig v. 600 North Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- de Vries v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Robles v. MirzakhmedovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- DiSalvo v. OrdwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- HSBC Bank USA v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. MozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Singh v. TrahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bergling v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bergling v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.