Legal Opinion
de Vries v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 2004PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered September 12, 2003, which, after a traverse hearing, found that plaintiff had not properly served defendants-respondents New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, denied her application for leave to re-serve pursuant to CPLR 306-b, and dismissed the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff’s application for leave to re-serve defendants-respondents New York City Transit Authority and the Manhattan and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. KinchenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Citron v. SchlossbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Clinton Central School District v. Clinton Teachers' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Matthews v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Palermo v. TacconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Mead v. SinglemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Spath v. ZackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.