Legal Opinion
Bergling v. Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 25, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Upon reargument, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve a summons and complaint upon the defendant Joel M. Schwartz (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95 [2001]; Robles v Mirzakhmedov, 34 AD3d 554, 554-555 [2006]; see also Thompson v City of New York, 89 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2011]; Samet v Binson, 67 AD3d 988, 989 [2009]; Matter of Mobilevision Med. Imaging Servs., LLC v Sinai Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, P.C., 66 AD3d 685, 686 [2009];…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Thompson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rosenzweig v. 600 North Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Robles v. MirzakhmedovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Samet v. BinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015