Legal Opinion
Rosenzweig v. 600 North Street, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 2006PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a housing merchant implied warranty, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered December 9, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend the time to serve the defendants with a summons and complaint for 120 days from the date of the order.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In determining whether to grant an extension of time to serve a summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 306-b, due diligence is only one factor to consider along…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Beauge v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Chiaro v. D'AngeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Baione v. ZambranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Thompson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- DiBuono v. Abbey, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Selmani v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Jhang v. Nassau University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.