Legal Opinion

Harris v. Warner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

The principal question, and, in the view we take, the only one we are required to determine, arises between the plaintiff appellee, and the intervener, the appellant, over the ownership of a certain note payable to the order 3 of Ennis Boggs, for $10,000, dated February 28, 1918, signed by the appellees Charley Warner an(j Minnie Warner, and secured by a mortgage on land. It is conceded that there is but $3,000 and accrued interest due on the note. The note bears the following indorsements :

“Int. paid to 28 Feby. 1919.” “Int. paid to Feby. 28 1920.” “I hereby assign to Ella P.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frink v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Amidon v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. In re Estate of FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Wegener v. Emmetsburg National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Consolidated Oils v. BartelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Cox v. WaudbySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Andrew v. State Bank of New HamptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Kowalke v. EvernhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Federal Land Bank v. SherburneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API