Legal Opinion

Wegener v. Emmetsburg National Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The pleadings are voluminous and complicated, though the salient facts are few. A preliminary statement of the facts will simplify the statement of the issues.

The plaintiff, being induced by fraudulent representations, contracted to purchase 250 shares of capital stock in the Midland Packing Company at par value of $100 per share. Under the contract, he was to pay one fourth the contract price in cash and to give his notes for the balance. In lieu .of the cash payment, however, he executed and delivered to the packing com*1269pany his two negotiable promissory notes for an aggregate sum of $6,250.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Todd v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Frink v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  3. Bettis v. BristolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andrew v. State Bank of New HamptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Kiekhoefer v. United States National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Home State Bank v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Pennoyer v. Dubois State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Harris v. WarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API