Legal Opinion

Kowalke v. Evernham

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1930No. 40407PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

In effect, as stated in the preamble, the proceeding hereunder reviewed was an action by the plaintiff-appellant for alternative relief against the defendants-appellees as follows: First, the specific performance of a real estate contract; or, second, the foreclosure thereof; and, or, third, judgment for the amount due thereunder. Two written agreements are involved, but the latter is really supplemental to the former, and the instruments do not in any material way conflict. Both Lotta B. Evernham and Furman H. Evernham, appellees, together with the appellant, Walter H. Kowalke, signed the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Easton v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Bottorff v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Bates v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Smith v. Crawford County State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Hausbrandt v. HoflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Decker v. JuzwikSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. In Re Guardianship of BriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. In Re Guardianship of BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Wallace v. SpraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Floberg v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API