Legal Opinion

Cox v. Waudby

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1988No. 87-1653PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Defendants, Clell Waudby and Helen Waudby, appeal from a district court order establishing that their jointly owned homestead property is subject to levy and sale as a result of tracing proceeds of a fraudulent transaction carried out by defendant Clell Waudby. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below.

On December 8, 1986, the trial court entered a final judgment and decree in favor of plaintiffs and against Clell Waud-by in the underlying fraud action. Although defendant Helen Waudby was also a party to the action, there were no findings of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Baucum v. Texam Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Regal Insurance Co. v. Summit Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Jones v. NicholasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. CruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Benson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Tramel v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. In Re Property Seized From BlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Baratta v. Polk County Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API