Cox v. Waudby
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
Defendants, Clell Waudby and Helen Waudby, appeal from a district court order establishing that their jointly owned homestead property is subject to levy and sale as a result of tracing proceeds of a fraudulent transaction carried out by defendant Clell Waudby. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. Facts and Proceedings Below.
On December 8, 1986, the trial court entered a final judgment and decree in favor of plaintiffs and against Clell Waud-by in the underlying fraud action. Although defendant Helen Waudby was also a party to the action, there were no findings of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Baucum v. Texam Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Regal Insurance Co. v. Summit Guaranty Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Jones v. NicholasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. CruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Benson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Tramel v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- In Re Property Seized From BlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Baratta v. Polk County Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.