Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lane

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1938No. Civ. 5860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action was begun by Ruth C. Davis, plaintiff and appellant, the daughter of Thomas L. Davis, deceased, against the respondents, Paul Kunde, Gene Morrison and Henry Lane, to recover damages for and on account of the death of Thomas L. Davis, occasioned on or about April 14, 1936, in a collision between an electric ear belonging to Sacramento Northern Railway, and operated by Thomas L. Davis, and a truck owned by Kunde and Morrison and operated by Lane. The Sacramento Northern Railway intervened in the action and filed a complaint against Kunde and Morrison to recover the amount of damages…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lininger v. San Francisco, Vallejo & Napa Valley RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. DeArmond v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API