Hill v. Matthews Paint Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
By the instant action, plaintiff sought damages for losses sustained as the result of a fire allegedly caused by the spontaneous combustion of a spray material purchased from defendant. Trial was to the court without a jury. The court found for defendant and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s complaint comprises three causes of action. Count I alleges, in substance, that defendant breached an express oral representation, promise and warranty to manufacture a spray finish material “which would be safe and in all respects fit and proper for plaintiff’s use and capable…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Bohn v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Petersen v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Rexall Drug Co. v. NihillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Montijo v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Deckard v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.