Legal Opinion

Stanford Land Co. v. Steidle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1902No. 4102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.— Hon. John C. Denney, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

— Respondent commenced an action of unlawful detainer against the appellants to recover a parcel of land described as follows:

“The land actually occupied by K. L. McKenzie’s old house, north of Johanna McKenzie’s new house. Said house is about thirty rods southeast of the old Kromer house, on an unrecorded plat of lands south of Wall street and west of Rucker avenue, known as the Kromer tract, in the city of Everett, Snohomish county, Washington.”

Kespondent alleged that it was a corporation, and set forth an abstract of its title to the land.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HydeWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Lowman v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API