Legal Opinion

Pacific Drug Co. v. Hamilton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1913No. 10490PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered February 3, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to recover, upon one cause of action, the purchase price of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff, Pacific Drug Company of Seattle, to the defend*470ant; and also .to recover upon another cause of action the purchase price of goods sold and delivered by Lowman & Hanford Company of Seattle, to the defendant, the claim of the latter being assigned to the plaintiff before the commencement of the action. The trial was before the court without a jury. The defendant moved for nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence; which motion being denied, he rested without offering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PittamWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Miller v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. National Bank of Commerce of Tacoma v. GallandWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Stanford Land Co. v. SteidleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. KyteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  2. Dalton Adding MacHine Sales Co. v. LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Association Collectors, Inc. v. HardmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. StatelenWashington Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API