Legal Opinion

Lowman v. West

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1894No. 1112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King Covmty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The material portions of the complaint in this case (an action for unlawful detainer), so far as the merits were concerned, were as follows:

1. That plaintiffs were husband and wife.

2. That at all times herein mentioned the defendants, D. W. West and Lloyd Jones, were and are now in the possession of [description], as the tenants of the plaintiff J. D. Lowman. That said tenancy of said defendants was and is a tenancy from month to month, with monthly rental reserved, payable monthly in advance on the first day of each and every month.

3. That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. HigginsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Von Glahn v. BrennanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Appleton v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Estate of ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. O'Connell v. AraiWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Smeltzer v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Mounts v. GoransonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Lowman v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API