Legal Opinion

Thomas v. MacKlen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938No. 14625PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Eishburne.

This appeal brings up for review the constitutionality of an Act of the General Assembly, approved on April 23, 1937, providing for a plan whereby so-called “resort communities” within the bounds of the State may be incorporated as municipal corporations. Acts 1937, p. 309.

Inasmuch as the questions presented deal solely with the unique provisions of this Act, which the respondents assert is antagonistic to various provisions of the Constitution of this State, and to which frequent reference must be made, we deem it desirable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Matter of HennebergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New York (Elm St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Wanser v. HoosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  3. Windham v. PaceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. McElveen v. StokesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API