Legal Opinion

Wanser v. Hoos

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 21 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see ante p. 35, sub nomine Hoos v. O’Donnell.

1Opinion of the Court

*524The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

The issue presented in this case is upon the validity of an act of the legislature, passed March 18th, 1897, entitled “An act relating to cities of the first class in this state, and providing for the holding of municipal and charter elections therein, and regulating the terms of elective and appointive officers therein.” Pamph. L., p. 43. It provides that all municipal officers in cities of the first class shall be elected in each year on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, which is the day fixed for the annual election of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. State v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Werts v. RogersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Warner v. HoaglandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Dingeman v. LacyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Town of Longview v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Thomas v. MacKlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API