Legal Opinion
Windham v. Pace
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 15, 1939No. 14987PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishburne.
The Circuit Court refused motions made in behalf of the two defendants in these cases, to change the place of trial from Dorchester County to Charleston County. The record in the lower Court included the complaint and answers, and numerous affidavits submitted by each side, and that Court held that the venue was properly laid under Section 8511, Code of 1932.
The actions were brought by the plaintiffs, who are residents of Dorchester County, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by them when an automobile in which they…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Thomas v. MacKlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Townsend v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Independence Ins. v. Independent Life & Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Greenville Baseball, Inc. v. Bearden, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Weston v. Carolina Research & Development FoundationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Multi-Cinema, Ltd. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.