Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1903PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Indictment against W. Q. Hammond for failure to remove a dam. From judgment of Sessions Court reversing judgment of magistrate dismissing prosecution, the State appeals. cite: On the question decided: 42 S. C., 230; 56 S. C., 516; 21 S. C., 420; 26 S. C., 348; 62 S. C., 28; 93 U. S., 23; 113 U. S., 27; 6 Ency., 2 ed., 967, 1020, 1021; 23 S. C., 56; 2 Black Con. Law, 294; 10 L. R. A., 178; 2 McC., 301; 53 S. C., 278; 109 Mass:, 319; 30 N. H., 279; Tiedeman Pol.

Read the full summary

Indictment against W. Q. Hammond for failure to remove a dam. From judgment of Sessions Court reversing judgment of magistrate dismissing prosecution, the State appeals. cite: On the question decided: 42 S. C., 230; 56 S. C., 516; 21 S. C., 420; 26 S. C., 348; 62 S. C., 28; 93 U. S., 23; 113 U. S., 27; 6 Ency., 2 ed., 967, 1020, 1021; 23 S. C., 56; 2 Black Con. Law, 294; 10 L. R. A., 178; 2 McC., 301; 53 S. C., 278; 109 Mass:, 319; 30 N. H., 279; Tiedeman Pol. Pow., 426, 427; 6 Cranch, 87; 64 N. H., 549. The latter cite: On the.question decided: 56 S. C., 521; 42 LR. A., 438; 88 111., 554;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

The defendant was arrested under a warrant charging him with violating section 1275, R. S., 1893, as amended by act of 1900, 23 Stat., 448, by maintaining a rock dam on a-running stream in the county of Anderson, after forty-eight hours from notice to remove the same. A motion was made, before the magistrate, C. P. Kay, Escp, to dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that said act is unconstitutional, is in violation of art. III., sec. 34, of the Constitution, prohibiting local or special legislation. The magistrate dismissed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Henderson v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
  3. Carolina Grocery Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. Dean v. County of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Santee Mills v. QuerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  3. Sirrine v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Thomas v. MacKlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API