Legal Opinion
Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'n
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 2004No. 29896, 29897, 29898, 29899, 29900, 29901PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
The defendant-seed growers are appealing the district court’s decision holding the amendments to I.C. § 22-4801 et seq., which were passed by the 2003 Legislature, unconstitutional. This Court granted a permissive appeal of this interlocutory order. For the reasons outlined below, we hold the recently enacted amendments to be in conformity with the Idaho and United States Constitutions.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs are individuals claiming sensitivity to grass smoke, who filed an action against various seed growers in north Idaho who traditionally burn the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- American Falls Reservoir District No. 2 v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Lindsey v. DeGrootIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Luce v. MarbleIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Citizens Against Range Expansion v. Idaho Fish & Game DepartmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.