Legal Opinion
James D. Clark v. County of Winnebago, a Body Politic
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 29, 1987No. 15-3311PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, James D. Clark, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the fourteenth amendment against the County of Winnebago, Illinois (the County), alleging that the denial of his request to rezone his property as a mobile home district violated his right to due process. He also challenged the constitutionality of those portions of the County’s zoning ordinance regulating mobile homes. The district court entered judgment for the County. We affirm.
I
The County has adopted a zoning ordinance that regulates the uses of land within the County. The ordinance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Robert and Sharon Albery v. Cal Reddig, Both Individually and as Zoning Administrator for the City of Rock IslandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greater Chicago Combine & Center Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Northside Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Bibco Corp. v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Hold Fast Tattoo, LLC v. City of North ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Shannon v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.