Legal Opinion

Greater Chicago Combine & Center Inc. v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 2005No. 05-1271PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

The City of Chicago enacted an ordinance that prohibited the keeping of pigeons in most residential areas of the city. An organization of homing pigeon keepers, known as the Greater Chicago Combine and Center, Inc., sued the city claiming that the ordinance violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The district court granted the city summary judgment. We affirm.

I

In September 2003, Chicago’s city council passed the “Restrictions on Pigeons” ordinance in response to citizen complaints about feathers, droppings, odor, and noise (cooing) generated…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Napleton v. Village of HinsdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Adkins v. VIM Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Rabe v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Johnson v. OrrCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Patrick Hayden v. Greensburg Community School CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API