Legal Opinion
Hold Fast Tattoo, LLC v. City of North Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 7, 2008No. 07 C 4479PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES B. MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Defendant City of North Chicago moves under FRCP 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, Hold Fast Tattoo. For reasons hereinafter stated, plaintiffs complaint is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
In ruling on defendant’s motion, we accept as true all facts alleged in plaintiffs complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of plaintiff. St. John’s United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 502 F.3d 616, 625 (7th Cir.2007) (12(b)(1) motion); McMillan v. Collection Prof'ls, Inc., 455 F.3d 754, 758 (7th Cir.2006)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Coleman v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Anderson v. City of Hermosa BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Brad Buehrle v. City of Key WestCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Jucha v. City of North ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Anderson v. City of Hermosa BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.