Legal Opinion

Grant v. Maslen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by John Grant, administrator of the estate of Archibald Grant, deceased, against Frank Maslen, executor of the last will and testament of Andrew Anderson, deceased, for money paid. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Archibald Grant, plaintiff’s decedent, in 1894= entered into a certain paving contract with the city of Detroit. This contract among other things required the contractor to protect excavations with proper barriers and colored lights to prevent accidents, and to indemnify the city from damages arising by reason of negligence in that regard. The excavating was done by Andrew Anderson, defendant’s decedent, as a subcontractor, at the price per cubic yard Grant was to receive under the contract. By reason of the negligence of this subcontractor in not putting up guards and colored lights, William…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Fire & Marine Insurance v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Knickerbocker v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. City of Detroit v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Anderson v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moyses v. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Otis Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Township of Hart v. NoretMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Strait Scale Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Village of Portland v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API