Anderson v. Grant
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Andrew Anderson against Archibald Grant to recover a balance claimed to be due upon a contract for excavating. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
August 1, 1894, Archibald Grant, the appellee, entered into a contract with the city of Detroit to pave River street, from the east curb line of McKinstry avenue to the west curb line of Artillery avenue, with cedar blocks on plank and sand foundation. The pavement was to be “in conformity with the specifications and estimates hereto attached and made a part of this contract, and the grades and cross sections of said work now on file in the board of public works’ office, according to all the conditions herein named, and to the acceptance of the said party of the first part.” The…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Village of Portland v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Buffa v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1955
- Grant v. MaslenMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Anderson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.