Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Knickerbocker v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This was an action of assumpsit brought to recover upon a written undertaking to indemnify the plaintiff against all harm by reason of his signing a* replevin bond with Bellman & Handy* in a suit brought by them against Naomi Warner, at Elkhart, Ind. The following is the undertaking sued on:

“John Cox, Henry Hall, L. T. Wilcox, E. E. Wilcox,

President. Vice President. . Cashier. Asst. Cashier.

“Established 1872. Reorganized 1884.
“Three Rivers National Bank.
“Three Rivers, Mich., Oct. 11, 1886.
“W. H. Knickerbocker, Cashier,
“ Elkhart, Indiana.
“ Dear Sir: A replevin suit has been commenced in your…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bullard v. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Matthews v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Wiley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
  4. Hayes v. BrubakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Tilden v. BarnardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Grant v. MaslenMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. United States Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. First National Bank v. City National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Johnson v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API