Legal Opinion

Otto Milk Co. v. Washington City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1949No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court below denying plaintiff the full relief it sought.

The plaintiff is a Pennsylvania corporation domiciled in the City of Pittsburgh and engaged in the business of receiving, processing and distributing at wholesale, milk and derivates thereof, within a radius of fifty miles of that City. The defendant is a municipal corporation in the County of Washington.

The plaintiff has fully qualified to sell milk and kindred products under the laws of this Commonwealth, holds a permit issued by the State Secretary of Health…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Flynn v. HorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gambone v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Shapiro v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Speers Borough School District v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API