Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell :
On June 28, 1957, the Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion held that Section 302 of the Ordinance of Eastto'wn Township was unconstitutional as applied *78to petitioners’ property. Today a majority of this Court, including former Justice Chidsey, overrule that decision and hold that the Ordinance is constitutional. This relatively simple case has attained monumental stature because, in order to reach its conclusion, the three present members of this Court (1) have had to repudiate and by necessary implication overrule myriad decisions of this Court, and (2)…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.