Flynn v. Horst
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the decree of the court below adjudging so much of section 2 of the Act of May 29, 1901, P. L. 327, as amended by the Act of June 5, 1913, P. L. 412, section 1, 31 PS 802, which imposes license fees of $500 upon wholesale dealers in oleomargarine and $100 upon retail dealers of oleomargarine, unconstitutional and void, and enjoining the defendants and their agents from attempting to collect such fees as a condition precedent to the wholesale and retail dealers engaging in the business of selling oleomargarine.
The matter came before the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chastleton Corp. v. SinclairSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- National Biscuit Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- MASTRANGELO v. BUCKLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Anstine v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.