Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pinckney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 19, 1995PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The sole issue in this appeal from the denial of the defendant’s motion for new trial concerns the trial judge’s instructions to the jury on the Commonwealth’s burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We reverse the judge’s denial of the defendant’s motion and order a new trial.

The defendant was indicted in 1971 for murder in the first degree and rape. He was tried before a jury, found guilty and was sentenced in early 1972. The convictions were affirmed on direct appeal in 1973. Commonwealth v. A Juvenile, 364 Mass. 103 (1973) (vacated as to death penalty). In 1991, the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. GunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Gilday v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API