Legal Opinion

Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. McClellan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2007No. 05-16386PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to resolve conflicting statutory interpretations of § 402(e) of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(b), which requires the federal government to pay 100 percent of certain Medicaid costs for services “which are received through an Indian Health Service facility.” 1 The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (“Arizona”), the state entity that administers Arizona’s Medicaid program, interprets this language as requiring the federal government to reimburse states for all health care services provided to Medicaid-eligible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Doe v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Joshua A. Ex Rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Madden v. Cowen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Ibrahim Bare v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Willie Goffney, Jr. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API