Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Gregory
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2003No. 51A05-0305-CV-245PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In December 2001, Dustin Todd Wolfe filed his Complaint seeking a prescriptive easement, injunctive relief and damages against Brooke Wolfe Gregory, Monty L. Gregory, Marvin L. Lagle, and Margie R. Cornett, {/k/a Margie R. Asbell (collectively "the Defendants"). In October 2002, Wolfe amended his complaint to include a claim of easement of necessity. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered a general judgment in favor of the Defendants. Wolfe filed a Motion to Correct Error, which the court denied. Wolfe now appeals and raises a single issue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Contel of Indiana, Inc. v. CoulsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Whitt v. FerrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cockrell v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- William C. Haak Trust v. WiluszIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Downing v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pardue v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- James L. Hochgesang v. Stanley McLain, Sr. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Ronald G. Arnold and B. Candi Arnold v. Allen Robert Linnemeier and Kathy Sue LinnemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013