Legal Opinion

William C. Haak Trust v. Wilusz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2011No. 64A04-1008-PL-567PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRADFORD, Judge.

Appellant-Plaintiff the William C. Haak Trust (“the Trust”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of Ap-pellees-Defendants William J. and Judith A. Wilusz and Benjamin Luna in its quiet title action, in which it sought an easement of necessity. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Trust is in possession of a landlocked parcel of land in Porter County. Directly to the north of the Trust’s parcel is land owned by the Wiluszes, and the land directly to the east of both parcels and sharing both…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brown v. HeidersbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Finn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. New York Central Railroad v. YarianIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Short v. Southern Union Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Windgate Properties, LLC v. Chris SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Town of Ellettsville, Indiana Plan Commission and Richland Convenience Store Partners, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Palmer v. R. A. Yancey Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  5. Carroll v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API