Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Hawkins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2002No. 53A01-0107-CV-275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

William F.F. Cockrell appeals the trial court's judgment denying his request for an easement of necessity over the land of Dorothy Hawkins. Cockrell raises a number of issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court's denial of Cockrell's request for an easement of necessity was contrary to law. 'We affirm.

The facts most favorable to the judgment follow. On February 15, 1996, Cock-rell purchased thirteen and one-third acres of real estate in Polk Township, Monroe County, Indiana. Cockrell purchased the land from thirty-four individuals who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Larabee v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Moore v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel McNutt v. OrcuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Sanders v. CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William C. Haak Trust v. WiluszIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Downing v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Robert Hoyt v. Michael BenhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Hysell v. KimmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Wolfe v. GregoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API