Legal Opinion
Caswell v. City of Bloomington
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 28, 2006No. 05-2519 (RHK/AJB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Jeffrey Caswell, Victoria Cas-well, and Russ Dryer (“Plaintiffs”) allege that Defendant City of Bloomington (the “City”) violated their rights under the United States and Minnesota Constitutions by enacting an ordinance that fails to protect them from potential hazards associated with being in the vicinity of an airport runway. This matter comes before the Court on the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion.
BACKGROUND
In May 2004, the City adopted a zoning…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Foster v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011