Legal Opinion

Ullrich v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 11, 1936No. 6900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

This case presents another phase of the same general circumstances involved in Barbour v. Thomas et al. (Connolly, Receiver, v. Thomas, Receiver) 86 F.(2d) 510 (C.C.A.), Nos. 7116 and 7117, this day decided.

Appellants were common stockholders in the Detroit Bankers Company, herein called the holding company. They acquired their stock prior to January 1, 1931, by exchange for shares of the Detroit Trust Company and the Bank of Michigan, component units of the holding company.

They were without objection permitted to intervene and file a motion to dismiss the cross-bill of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Barbour v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  3. Hulse v. ArgetsingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Simons v. GroesbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Howard v. LeeteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schram v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Lucking v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  3. MacPherson v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  4. Schram v. LuckingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940
  5. Anderson v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API