Legal Opinion
Hulse v. Argetsinger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 4, 1927No. 189, 206PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The receiver of a national bank appointed by the comptroller is his officer, not an officer of the court, nor are its assets while in his hands in custodia legis (In re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 458, 17 S. Ct. 385, 41 L. Ed. 782); they do not become such by an order confirming a composition of debts made by him. Such an order is merely a condition upon the receiver’s power to compound the debt; it is not made in any suit, nor does it adjudicate any rights inter partes. Fifer v. Williams, 5 F.(2d) 286 (C. C. A. 9); Jackson v. McIntosh, 12 F.(2d) 676, 678 (C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Liberty Nat. Bank of South Carolina v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Fifer v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Jackson v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- Ex Parte MooreDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- In Re the Liquidation of Franklin National BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Franklin National Bank v. Jean M. Grella, Jean M. GrellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Granzow v. Village of Lyons, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Mitchell v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.