Legal Opinion

Ganiats Construction, Inc. v. Hesse

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1960No. Civ. 18587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This appeal 1 originates in appellant’s option to purchase real property, its consolidated suits for a declaratory judgment and specific performance, and a decree adverse to appellant. Appellant directs its primary attack against the court’s conclusion that the option agreement violates the statute of frauds. Appellant secondarily challenges the trial judge’s sustention of various equitable defenses to specific performance, including an alleged harsh contract, unclean hands, and inadequate consideration, as well as his denial of damages to appellant. Since we believe that the trial court’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pigeon v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Lawrence v. ShuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Rivers v. BeadleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. McKeon v. Santa Claus of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API