Fleet-Wing Corp. v. Clark
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Judge.
Complainant, a wholesale supplier of gasoline to jobbers in various cities in Indiana and Michigan, having unsuccessfully protested the provisions of MPR-88, Section 5, and particularly subsection 5.2(b) as interpreted, filed its complaint in this court, asserting that an interpretation of subsection 5.2(b) of MPR-88 issued May 12, 1945 .by the Chief Counsel of the. Petroleum Branch of the Office of Price Administration, known as OPA Interpretation 52, has no application to complainant or, in the alternative, that if it applies to complainant, it renders the regulation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowles v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Conklin Pen Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Collins v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Van Der Loo v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Fast v. Di Salle, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
- Woods v. GoltDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Western Union Telegraph Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Allied Oil Corp. v. TurneyEmergency Court of Appeals · 1948