Legal Opinion

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1987No. C8-85-1187PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal involves the intentional act exclusion of a homeowner’s liability policy, and whether an insured may use his voluntary intoxication to establish he lacked the capacity, during an assault, to form an intent to injure the person he assaulted. We construe the policy language not to allow voluntary intoxication to be so used, and we reverse the judgment finding insurance coverage for the insured’s assault.

On August 28, 1981, Stephen Peterson was in his girlfriend’s apartment with the landlady. 1 He asked the landlady, Lana Kelsey, if he might buy the stove and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WickaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API