Legal Opinion

Wilson v. San Francisco-Oakland & Terminal Railways

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1920No. Civ. No. 3314PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by her through the negligence of the defendant corporation while she was riding as a passenger on the street-car of said defendant corporation. The action was tried by a jury, and the court directed a verdict ■ in favor of the defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which plaintiff appeals.

The defendant corporation was the only defendant answering, and it pleaded a release executed by plaintiff, to the effect that she had accepted from said defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Castle v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. DonnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Kelly v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Jordan v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lamento v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API