Legal Opinion

Lamento v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1925No. 6619PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in the District Court below was indicted, tried, and convicted under the first count for a violation of sections 1 and 8 (sections 6287g, 6287n, U. S. Compiled Statutes) of the Anti-Narcotic Act of December 17, 1914, as amended February 24, 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6287g), in that about July 5, 1923, at Kansas City, Mo., being a retail dealer, he was in possession of about six ounces of smoking opium without having paid the special tax provided by that act, and, under the second count, for a violation of the same act in that he purchased on or…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gomila v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Edward John Petschl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  4. Van Gorder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Ayers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API