Legal Opinion

Model Water & Light Co. v. Dickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1933No. 24398. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The appellant, as plaintiff, by this action sought to recover a personal judgment against certain land owners for its annual water maintenance assessments charged against their land.

' A trial on the merits resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law unfavorable to the plaintiff. A judgment followed dismissing its action, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The controlling facts are undisputed, and so far as necessary to a decision may be briefly summarized as follows: Appellant is a mutual service corporation supplying water to a district under contract with the land…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Norfleet v. CromwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  3. Fitch v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lingle Water Users' Ass'n v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cabell v. Fed. Land Bank of SpokaneOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Laramie Rivers Co. v. WatsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API