Legal Opinion
People v. Hayhurst
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 21, 1977No. 27748PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan
This is an interlocutory appeal from a district court ruling suppressing physical evidence and an incriminating statement. We reverse.
The suppression order was based on the following findings of fact: On the evening of March 15, 1975, the appellee, David Hayhurst, then a juvenile, attended a swimming party also attended by Mark Cisneros, then fifteen. Hayhurst invited Cisneros to go with him in a van to a remote country road “to see some drag races.” At about 12:30 a.m., March 16, Hayhurst and a companion allegedly beat Cisneros severely with a hammer and pushed him out of the van. Cisneros…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CleckleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Pueblo v. Acevedo EscobarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
- State v. WhittenbackUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HelmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.