Legal Opinion

State v. Whittenback

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1980No. 16575, 16738PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

This is an appeal from convictions of theft 1 by co-defendants Whittenback and Parrett.

Pursuant to police department directives, on March 26, 1979, at approximately 1:00 a. m., Officer Craig Geslison was patrolling an area of Provo, Utah, where several thefts from businesses had recently been reported. He noticed defendants within an all-night laundromat and recognized them from a previous encounter. 2 Geslison called for assistance, entered the laundromat, asked defendants for their identification, and inquired as to what they were doing there. Defendants answered that they…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. ArroyoUtah Supreme Court · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API