Commonwealth v. Cleckley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
Appellant contends that a consensual search should be deemed valid under Article I, Section 8 of Pennsylvania Constitution only where it can be shown that the person subject to the search knew that he or she had the right to refuse such consent. For the reasons that follow, we disagree and, accordingly, affirm the decision of the Superior Court.
On December 23, 1995, Officer John Deluca of the Borough of Koppel Police Department went to Phil’s Inn with an arrest warrant for one Andrew Pounds. Upon being arrested, Pounds informed the officer that appellant, who was inside…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. KempSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.